PHIL SPECTOR WILL BE ACQUITTED - PREDICTS ALLISON
LA's Dopest Attorney gives us her legal opinion
on why the jury will find Phil Spector innocent.
The original LA's Dopest Attorney Youtube
"Allison Margolin calls herself Los Angeles’s “dopest attorney.” The 28-year-old graduate of Beverly Hills High, Columbia University and Harvard Law School has her own blog and promotional video on YouTube. Today, the Los Angeles Times helps her cause with a colorful profile of the ambitious young criminal defense lawyer.." Wall Street Journal
"LA's Dopest lawyer, again: Allison Margolin, the 28-year-old Harvard Law grad whose ads offering to represent pot smokers are a staple of the local alt weeklies..." LA Observed
"A lawyer for 3 1/2 years, Margolin has gained notoriety for unorthodox ads that proclaim her "L.A.'s dopest attorney." She even has a video publicizing her practice on the Internet site Youtube." LA Times
"Beverly Hills lawyer Allison Margolin made a three-and-a-half-minute video for YouTube about her practice and her position on issues such as marijuana laws, getting her noticed by commentators all over the Internet." ABA Journal
"L.A. dopest attorney," should send producers scrambling to option the rights to the Harvard Law by way of Beverly Hills High grad's Legally Blonde meets Half Baked life story.
Defamer.com
"One very ingenious young lawyer out of California did just that to give herself a competitive edge. Allison Margolin, a newly minted Harvard Law School graduate, who concentrates in criminal law, is very passionate about the decriminalization of marijuana. Her video highlights not just her criminal practice, but has testimonials of her and a client on the courthouse steps. The video allows her to showcase her mission through a medium her client base would most likely use." Connecticut Law Review
"Framed Skunk Magazine features and Us Weekly covers adorn her office walls alongside diplomas from Columbia and Harvard Law. She's been profiled in the Los Angeles Times and keeps a personal blog that covers everything from social and legal commentary to musings on Paris Hilton and Playboy. You can even watch YouTube videos of her expounding on why all drugs should be legalized." Helen Jupiter-Blogger.LA.com
"Allison Margolin, if you read articles written on her, projects nothing less than who she is, irreverent quirky, passionate and committed, well-educated, gutsy, and weaned on criminal law. And her 'brand' shows all of that." Build A Solo Practice, LLC
I've really enjoyed reading about what you've done with yourself from college, right up to now. I also think your networking/marketing prowess is what pisses off your detractors most. YouTube? A stroke of genius!!! They'll make a movie about you eventually! But you already know that right?" Cannazine - Myspace friend
"Been watching you on you tube AMAZZZZZZIIINNNGGG
The best LAWYER - this world needs such people like you to bring justice back RESPECT be blessed and wish you lots of positive energy. STAY STRONG ALLISON." Ash - Tribe.net
LA's Dopest Attorney NEW Youtubes
June 27, 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
BEHIND EVERY DOPE LAWYER...
A COLLECTION OF DOPE CLASSICS
|
| LA's Dopest Group |
| Let us hang together... |
4 comments:
We'll see, but I think that this was not helpful Allison.
If he is convicted, you have put some sand in the eyes of the public.
I am with you on ending cannabis prohibition, and as far as ending the war on drugs, but I do not want to link to this kind of thing. I will still read your blog and if I see something worth linking specifically, I will still do so.
I just want you to understand why I am removing you from the sidebar of Cannablog.
WOW.. no wonder i never got into drugs. they warp the mind as is clearly shown by whig's comment. there are more important things in life than weed. oh lets say like LIBERTY. if a lawyer cannot opine about the state's possible failure in meeting its burden of proof, well please puff puff and pass it the other way.
I am very offended and perturbed that someone would knock me off their links simply because I presented an analysis of---not my opinion on the guilt---Phil Spector. What, do non-pot defendants, not deserve their day in court? And should I shy away from pontificating on the subject because it involves murder not drugs? And how does this affect my views on drugs or anything about my character or website? I'm sick of marijuana elitists who think that other types of criminal defendant are inferior to those charged with marijuana crimes.
"Those who would give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
Benjamin Franklin
Allison,
I believe that he deserves his day in court, and a judgment of guilt or innocence by a jury of his peers, and the best legal representation he can possibly have in defending himself from the charges.
I do not believe that there is a benefit to a public rehabilitation of Phil Specter or a disparagement of the process which he is being afforded given the violence of the offense with which he is in fact charged unless he is acquitted. And yes, I believe he is not guilty until found so by the unanimous judgment of the jury.
You can surely take some criticism, I'm not against you, I just don't think this is what I endorse for the reasons I have stated. If you think my reasons are not good, I'm still reading.
Post a Comment